Similarity-Distance Decision-Making Technique and its Applications via Intuitionistic Fuzzy Pairs

Authors

  • Paul Augustine Ejegwa Department of Mathematics, University of Agriculture, Nigeria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-6433
  • Johnson Mobolaji Agbetayo Department of Mathematics, University of Agriculture, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCCE512522514

Keywords:

similarity measure, decision-making, intuitionistic fuzzy sets, distance measure, intuitionistic fuzzy pairs

Abstract

The idea of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) is a reasonable soft computing construct for resolving ambiguity and vagueness encountered in decision-making situations. Cases such as pattern recognition, diagnostic analysis, etc., have been explored based on intuitionistic fuzzy pairs via similarity-distance measures. Many similarity and distance techniques have been proposed and used to solve decision-making situations. Though the existing similarity measures and their distance counterparts are somewhat significant, they possess some weakness in terms of accuracy and their alignments with the concept of IFSs, which needed to be strengthened to enhance reliable outputs. As a consequent, this paper introduces a novel similarity-distance technique with better performance rating. A comparative analysis is presented to showcase the advantages of the novel similarity-distance over similar existing approaches. Some attributes of the similarity-distance technique are presented. Furthermore, the applications of the novel similarity-distance technique in sundry decision-making situations are explored.

 

Received: 8 December 2021 | Revised: 14 January 2022 | Accepted: 15 January 2022

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2022-01-25

How to Cite

Ejegwa, P. A., & Agbetayo, J. M. . (2022). Similarity-Distance Decision-Making Technique and its Applications via Intuitionistic Fuzzy Pairs. Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering, 2(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCCE512522514

Issue

Section

Research Articles