Computational Detection of Constitutional Drift: Network Analysis and Semantic Measurement of Argentine Supreme Court Jurisprudence (1922–2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951Keywords:
constitutional NLP, legal network analysis, citation network evolution, computational law, semantic text miningAbstract
This study introduces a computational framework for quantifying constitutional degradation through judicial citation network analysis and semantic text mining. Traditional legal scholarship relies on qualitative interpretation, which limits systematic cross-jurisdictional comparison and predictive modeling of constitutional evolution. This paper addresses that gap by developing three open-source algorithms applied to 72 Argentine Supreme Court decisions (1989–2025). Three algorithms were developed: JurisRank (a PageRank adaptation measuring doctrinal fitness through citation networks), RootFinder (Ancestral Borrowing Analysis Network for genealogical concept tracing), and Legal-Memespace (principal component analysis for multidimensional doctrine mapping). Cases were selected through stratified sampling covering emergency decrees, economic regulations, and control domains, with inter-coder reliability of 𝜅 = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76–0.89). Formalist constitutional interpretations declined in network fitness from 0.89 (1922 baseline) to 0.03 (2025), a reduction of 97%, while emergency doctrines rose from 0.11 to 0.97 (Kendall’s 𝜏 = −0.89, p < 0.001). K-fold cross-validation (k = 5) yields a mean accuracy of 73.2%. In the 2024–2025 period, institutional resistance to executive decrees correlated 0.91 with fiscal impact across 28 analyzed measures, suggesting selective constitutional enforcement. Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000) assign 82% probability to formalist doctrine reaching functional extinction (fitness < 0.05) by 2030. The framework enables automated constitutional monitoring, cross-jurisdictional comparison, and early crisis detection. All algorithms are released as open-source software (github.com/adrianlerer/peralta-metamorphosis) for independent validation and collaborative extension, demonstrating that evolutionary legal theory can transition from a speculative framework to an empirical research program.
Received: 20 October 2025 | Revised: 11 March 2026 | Accepted: 18 March 2026
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest to this work.
Data Availability Statement
Author Contribution Statement
Downloads
Published
2026-04-07
Issue
Section
Research Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Lerer, I. A. (2026). Computational Detection of Constitutional Drift: Network Analysis and Semantic Measurement of Argentine Supreme Court Jurisprudence (1922–2025). Journal of Computational Law and Legal Technology, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951