Automatic Enemy Identification—Are We There Yet?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAIA42022424

Keywords:

enemy identification, text similarity, sentence transformer models, natural language processing, machine learning

Abstract

Enemy items refer to any two items that should not appear on the same test form [1]. Accurately identifying enemy pairs is critical for ensuring the quality and fairness of exams, but it can also be challenging and time-consuming given the large number of possible item pairs in the exam item bank. Various enemy identification approaches have been explored to automate or semi-automate this task. In this process, the critical component is the encoding technique. The better the encoding technique captures the meaning of the sentences, the more accurate the similarity index and enemy classification results will be. This study focuses on evaluating the performance of a transformer-based model against the results from a string-based vector-space model (VSM) encoding technique under different research conditions for multiple-choice and multiple-response items used in a foundational IT certification exam. The results suggest that when using sufficient representative training data and conducting fine-tuning, the transformer-based model significantly outperforms the VSM model for enemy identification.

 

Received: 4 January 2024 | Revised: 11 April 2024 | Accepted: 30 April 2024 

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

 

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2024-05-30

How to Cite

Meng, H., & Li, J. (2024). Automatic Enemy Identification—Are We There Yet?. Artificial Intelligence and Applications. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAIA42022424

Issue

Section

Online First Articles