Implications of Classification Models for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Authors

  • Mengyao Kang Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Australia
  • Jiawei Zhao Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Australia
  • Farnaz Farid School of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University, Australia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6335-1885

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAIA32021406

Keywords:

machine learning, prediction models, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), healthcare, gradient boosted decision tree classifier

Abstract

Machine learning (ML)-based prediction models have the potential to revamp various industries, and one such promising area is healthcare. This study demonstrates the potential impact of ML on healthcare, particularly in managing patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The experimental results showcase the remarkable performance of ML models, surpassing doctors’ predictions for COPD patients. Among the evaluated models, the gradient-boosted decision tree classifier emerges as the top performer, displaying exceptional classification accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score compared to doctors’ experience. Notably, the comparison between the best ML model and doctors’ predictions reveals an interesting pattern: ML models tend to be more conservative, resulting in an increased probability of patient recovery.

 

Received: 25 July 2023 | Revised: 27 August 2023 | Accepted: 11 September 2023

 

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

 

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in PLOS ONE at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188532.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-09-14

How to Cite

Kang, M., Zhao, J., & Farid, F. (2023). Implications of Classification Models for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAIA32021406

Issue

Section

Research Article