Energy Assessment & Comparative Study of Mono and Poly Solar PV Technologies Using Advanced PVsyst Software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAAES42021881Keywords:
energy assessment, comparative study, mono-crystalline and poly-crystalline Solar PV technologies, PVsyt softwareAbstract
This study evaluates and compares the energy output of mono-crystalline and poly-crystalline solar photovoltaic (PV) technologies, under specific climatic conditions, with the help of advanced PVsyst software. This study aims to provide realizations into selecting the most effective PV technology by considering specific climatic and geographical conditions. In this study, monthly and yearly output energy, along with performance ratios, are evaluated for two conditions: firstly, for a 10.23KWp system, and subsequently, for a 58.2m² solar panel area. Both conditions demonstrate that mono-crystalline solar PV technology consistently outperforms poly-crystalline technology in terms of monthly and yearly output energy as well as performance ratio. Specifically, mono-crystalline panels generate 78 kWh more electricity annually in a 10.23 KWp system and 2469 kWh more in a system based on a specified PV module area. Additionally, they exhibit high-performance ratios in both scenarios. These findings strongly advocate for the preference of mono-crystalline technology within this region. Furthermore, the study offers valuable insights for addressing similar energy challenges in regions with comparable conditions, as far as solar panels energy outputs are affected by the climate conditions at most; so that for similar climate conditions in region would be effective. This research significantly contributes to facilitating well-informed decision-making processes, thereby augmenting energy accessibility.
Received: 14 October 2023 | Revised: 11 March 2024 | Accepted: 8 April 2024
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.
Data Availability Statement
Data available on request from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Author Contribution Statement
Wahidullah Zgham: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Resources, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration; Safiullah Shirzad: Software, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing - review & editing; Sayed Ahmad Zamir Fatemi: Formal analysis, Resources, Writing - review & editing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.