Blockchain Platforms for Developing Smart Contracts and Their Computational Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAIA52026923Keywords:
smart contract, Ethereum, Polkadot, Solana, Tron, Binance Smart Chain (BSC)Abstract
An independent, trusted third party or governing body is no longer necessary to conduct secure financial transactions because of blockchain technology. The topic of smart contracts and their ability to facilitate additional computational progress has risen to the forefront of academic and industry conversations in response to the dizzying rate of growth in blockchain technology. The scholarly work takes into account the material that has been assessed by experts and aims to explain the fundamental idea and provide a comprehensive computational analysis of relevant literature. Such an approach contributes to the advancement of decentralized applications (dApps) by providing technical insights into their development frameworks. The initial section presents a brief overview of smart contracts, including their conceptual foundations, system architecture, and application domains. Furthermore, in a detailed review of existing platforms for developing smart contracts, it was found by comparison that the Tron and CoreDAO blockchains offer the most computationally efficient platforms to enhance the quality-of-services (QoS) in decentralized environments. These low-cost transaction models support the creation of resource-efficient smart contracts. In addition, this study includes a simulation work that considers the blockchain transactions as a dataset to train an artificial intelligence model that would support the computational prediction of the success and failure of the transactions.
Received: 25 July 2025 | Revised: 23 October 2025 | Accepted: 5 December 2025
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Author Contribution Statement
Alock Gupta: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Project administration. Kamlesh Lakhwani: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Supervision.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.