Common Method Bias in Social and Behavioral Research: Strategic Solutions for Quantitative Research in the Doctoral Research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCBAR52024285

Keywords:

common method bias, research validity, self-report surveys, measurement error, statistical techniques, study design

Abstract

This paper addresses the critical issue of common method bias (CMB) in social and behavioral research, emphasizing its impact on the validity and reliability of quantitative studies, particularly in the context of doctoral-level research. CMB arises when data collection methods in doctoral research, such as self-report surveys, artificially inflate or deflate relationships between variables, leading to distorted findings. This can result in misleading conclusions, such as overstating the link between job satisfaction and employee performance, which may have serious implications for both academic research and policymaking. The paper offers a comprehensive overview of the sources and effects of CMB, along with strategies to detect, prevent, and control it. It highlights key statistical techniques, including Harman’s single-factor test, marker variable approaches, and latent variable modeling, to minimize bias during data analysis. Additionally, it outlines best practices for study design, such as temporal separation, varying measurement methods, and ensuring data collection anonymity, to reduce CMB from the outset. By implementing these strategies, researchers can enhance the validity and generalizability of their findings, ensuring that results reflect genuine relationships rather than artifacts of the research process.

 

Received: 7 September 2024 | Revised: 31 October 2024 | Accepted: 23 Januray 2025

 

Conflicts of Interest 

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest to this work.

 

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

 

Author Contribution Statement

Mohammad Rashed Hasan Polas: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration.


Downloads

Published

2025-02-21

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Polas, M. R. H. (2025). Common Method Bias in Social and Behavioral Research: Strategic Solutions for Quantitative Research in the Doctoral Research. Journal of Comprehensive Business Administration Research. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCBAR52024285