From Trails to Tokens: FinTech Frontiers for Sustainable Stewardship and Transparent Governance in Protected Recreation Landscapes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewFSI62028301Keywords:
FinTech, protected areas, governance, smart contracts, institutional trustAbstract
Protected recreation landscapes grapple with a chronic trust deficit driven by financial opacity, operational leakage, and social inequity as challenges largely sustained by traditional cash-based revenue systems. This paper introduces the Trails-to-Tokens (T2T) model, a novel governance architecture designed to bridge the gap between physical stewardship interactions (Trails) and transparent, digital financial instruments (Tokens). Synthesizing Socio-Ecological Systems and Institutional Trust theories, the T2T framework utilizes blockchain-enabled smart contracts to automate revenue sharing and reward stewardship based on verifiable ecological and social outcomes. A key contribution of this paper is the transition from purely conceptual discourse to a data-informed architectural roadmap. The study internalizes empirical findings from African protected areas, where revenue accountability often shows significant downward trends and community trust remains low. The T2T model addresses these failures by providing an operationalization matrix and a fourphase pilot protocol intended for future empirical validation. By replacing discretionary human intermediaries with immutable digital
ledgers, the model establishes a performance-linked social contract that is hypothesized to restore trust and foster financial resilience, provided the initial rule-setting is transparent. This paper offers a replicable methodology for conservation managers and policymakers, moving beyond aspirational digital trends toward a functional, transparent, and inclusive system for landscape governance. The result is a transformative approach that secures the long-term legitimacy of biodiversity financing through technological accountability and measurable stewardship.
Received: 19 November 2025 | Revised: 5 March 2026 | Accepted: 9 May 2026
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.
Data Availability Statement
Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Author Contribution Statement
Daniel Jacob: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. Imaobong Jacob: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. Kingsley Udofa: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. Koko Daniel: Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization. Simon Idoko Okweche: Validation, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Emmanuel Dan: Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Unyime Akpan: Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Pius Oko: Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Prince Evansly: Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing – review & editing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.